Health Law Update

Home | Health Law Update

<img class="alignright wp-image-3446 size-medium" src="https://healthlawupdate.bakerhostetlerblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2015/12/Doctor-with-Monitor-480733975-300x233.jpg" alt="Male anaesthesiologist with monitor" width="300" height="233" />

On December 2, 2015, an almost unanimous Federal Circuit decision was issued denying the en banc rehearing of Ariosa v. Sequenom, a case having significant consequences for diagnostic patents and Section 101 case law in general.[1] The concurrences and dissent in the Ariosa case offer insight into how the various judges perceive the existing Section 101 case law and attempt to offer applicants guidance in obtaining patent-eligible claims in the diagnostic arena. <a href="http://www.ipintelligencereport.com/2015/12/08/federal-circuit-denies-en-banc-review-of-ariosa-v-sequenom/#more-2384">Read more&gt;&gt;</a>

Federal Circuit denies en banc review of Ariosa v. Sequenom