[{"innerBlocks":[],"name":"core\/freeform","postId":565,"blockType":{"name":"core\/freeform","keywords":[],"attributes":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"html"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"providesContext":[],"usesContext":[],"supports":{"className":false,"customClassName":false,"reusable":false},"styles":[],"variations":[],"apiVersion":2,"title":"Classic","description":"Use the classic WordPress editor.","category":"text"},"originalContent":"On June 27, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment, denied Sequenom\u2019s petition for certiorari, leaving in place the Court\u2019s previous rulings prohibiting the patenting of laws of nature and natural phenomenon.\n\nRead more >><\/a><\/strong>","saveContent":"On June 27, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment, denied Sequenom\u2019s petition for certiorari, leaving in place the Court\u2019s previous rulings prohibiting the patenting of laws of nature and natural phenomenon.\n\nRead more >><\/a><\/strong>","order":0,"get_parent":{},"attributes":{"content":"On June 27, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment, denied Sequenom\u2019s petition for certiorari, leaving in place the Court\u2019s previous rulings prohibiting the patenting of laws of nature and natural phenomenon.\n\nRead more >><\/a><\/strong>"},"attributesType":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"html"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"dynamicContent":null}]

Supreme Court Denies Sequenom’s Petition for Certiorari